There are certain respects in which the proposal does not track all of the fine-grained structural contours of the transferred intent fiction — but that is a virtue of the proposal, not a vice. Suppose that the defendant negligently pets A’s dog, which he mistakenly believes to be his own. By doing so, he triggers a hidden motion detector that detonates a bomb, blowing up a cat that belongs to another person, B. By its terms the doctrine of transferred intent seems to apply to the tort of trespass to chattels,154 so it yields the result that the defendant is liable in trespass to B for the injury he has unforeseeably inflicted on her cat. But this seems entirely at odds with common moral understanding; the defendant seems no more morally liable than the train attendant in Palsgraf.
它可能选择错误的工具导致意外后果，也可能是被那些恶意的Skill诱导，执行危险操作。。whatsapp是该领域的重要参考
Good battery life。手游是该领域的重要参考
The feature at the center of the controversy is fairly mundane on the surface: A dog goes missing, Ring alerts nearby Ring owners to ask whether the animal shows up in their footage, and users can respond or ignore the request entirely to stay uninvolved. Siminoff leaned heavily on this throughout our conversation — the idea that doing nothing counts as opting out, and no one is conscripted into participating.